The workaround became the process
A WhatsApp message confirms what the system already recorded. Everyone uses it, so nobody questions it, and now there are two records.
Services
A purchase order is printed, signed, scanned and emailed back to the same building. Stock is counted twice because the first count is not trusted. Most of these steps were necessary once — a rule, a person or a system that no longer exists — and they survived because nobody asked whether they still earned their place. Before writing software, we walk the process and take the steps out.
A WhatsApp message confirms what the system already recorded. Everyone uses it, so nobody questions it, and now there are two records.
Every purchase past a small amount needs a signature. It catches nothing and adds two days, because the same three people sign everything.
Someone exports a file, edits it and imports it back. When they are on leave the process stops, and what they change is written nowhere.
Request, approval, purchase order, receipt, supplier invoice. At each step: who touches it, what they add, and whether the next step reads what they added.
The delivery note and the system entry are compared once, at the door, and a mismatch stops there instead of surfacing in the stock count three weeks later.
Everything done in the last three days of the month, in order, with the person and the file for each. Half of them usually turn out to be checks of earlier steps.
Open issues, cash drawer differences and pending deliveries written once and read by the next shift, instead of a verbal handover that loses the third item.
Fixed scope. Fixed price.
Agreed in writing before anything is built. You approve before we start.
Not in a meeting room. We watch a real order, a real delivery, a real close, and write the steps as they happen — including the ones people do not mention because they are obvious.
One page: boxes, arrows, and the names of the people and the files. If the page does not match what people remember doing, the page is wrong and we redraw it.
A step stays if it catches an error, satisfies an auditor, or produces something the next step reads. Otherwise it is a candidate for removal, and we say what breaks if it goes.
The software arrives after the process is shorter. Automating a step that should not exist makes the waste faster and harder to see.
FAQ
What owners usually ask before requesting a quote for it.
Usually not. Many of the removed steps disappear with a decision, not a release. Where a step survives and repeats, we automate it in the system you already use or in a small tool.
The person who owns the process, with the people who run it in the room. We bring the evidence: what the step costs and what it catches. We do not have the authority to remove a control, and we should not.
Then the map comes first and the automation waits. Sometimes what was built is still right and only the sequence is wrong; sometimes it automates a step that should go. We will say which, with the step in front of us.
No. One process map is a short piece of work, and the first removals are decisions rather than development. The part that takes time is agreeing on the change, not drawing it.
Start a project
Send the brief. It comes back as a written scope and a fixed quote before anything is built.