Articles
How to set a freelance rate without guessing
A rate comes from what a year of being available costs, divided by the days you can actually sell. The method, and the unit that decides the argument.
- freelancing
- pricing
- consulting
A rate is not a market lookup; it is what your year costs divided by what you can sell of it. Work those out and the price stops being a guess and becomes a decision you can defend. Get them wrong and no confidence in the quote will save the year.
What does being available cost you for a year?
Start with the months you will not invoice. Nobody bills every month, and pretending otherwise is why the first year feels like a windfall and the second like a trap. Take out the weeks you plan to rest, then those that go to illness, family and the slow season. Write down what is left, not what you hope is left.
Then add everything you pay before a client appears: the machine, the subscriptions, the connection, the hosting you keep, the accountant, the registration. Add the unpaid part of the job — proposals that went nowhere, invoices you chase, bookkeeping, the learning that keeps you sellable. In a one-person business that is a working day a week, and it is the line everyone forgets.
The total is what it costs to be a person a client can hire. Not a target income; the floor.
How does that become a day rate?
Divide the annual cost by the days you can actually sell, not by the days in the year. The first figure is far smaller than people assume: the weeks left after holidays and slow periods, minus the admin day, minus everything a client would not pay for. What remains is your sellable capacity.
Then decide what the year must produce above the floor: the surplus that replaces what an employer would have contributed — pension, paid leave, the slower months. That is not greed; it is arithmetic a salaried person never has to do. Add it and divide again.
The number looks high the first time, usually higher than what people around you charge. That is rarely a mistake in the sum; it is what the business needs, and the gap between it and a full calendar is the real problem to solve.
Why does an hourly rate punish you for being fast?
An hourly rate sells time, so the better you get, the less the same job pays. The task that used to take a fortnight now takes days, and the invoice shrinks while the client receives the same result: you are billing for the inefficiency you removed.
Clients notice, and the honest ones say so: they are asked to pay more for the slower person. What follows is a negotiation about hours rather than value, and every improvement becomes a threat to your income.
Why does a fixed price punish scope creep instead?
A fixed price sells a result, which is right, provided the result is written down. When it is not, the price covers an unknown amount of work, and every addition — "while you are in there", "one more screen" — is absorbed without a new number. The job does not turn unprofitable in one blow; it thins, week by week, until the last fortnight is unpaid.
Fixed price also hides risk where it feels comfortable: underestimate the integration and the loss is yours, discovered at the end, when the relationship is at its most fragile.
The fix is not to abandon fixed prices but to make the boundary explicit: what is included, what counts as a change, and what happens when one is asked for.
Which unit should the client see?
The unit the client already thinks in. A shop owner thinks in "the store", a company with a product in "this release", a client who needs someone on call in "the month". Quote in that unit even when your arithmetic is in days: the arithmetic is yours, the unit is theirs.
A unit is also an argument. "A day" invites the question of why it takes that many. "The project, delivered like this, at this price" invites a comparison with doing nothing. "A month of my time" starts a conversation about availability.
Quote in writing, with the boundary attached, and keep the day rate as the internal figure that tells you whether the quote is sane. The client never sees the scaffolding.
| The unit | What it protects | Where it fails |
|---|---|---|
| The hour | Nothing you control; the easiest to explain | It pays less as you get faster, and invites an audit of your time |
| The fixed price | Budget and margin, if the boundary is written | Unwritten scope, and risk you failed to see before quoting |
| The month | Continuity, and a client who plans around you | It hides how much work fits, unless the days are named |
How do you set it, in order?
- Write the weeks you will not invoice, from last year's calendar rather than from optimism.
- Total every cost you carry whether or not a client appears, and add the unpaid work that is part of the job.
- Subtract admin and unbillable time from your available weeks to get sellable days, add the surplus the year must produce, then divide. That is the floor, not the ceiling.
- Choose the unit the client thinks in, and write what the price includes and excludes; price anything outside it as a separate line.
- Re-run the calculation once a year, and after any month where the calendar was full and the account was not.
What do you do when the client anchors lower?
Do not defend the number; change what is inside it. A client who says "I have a smaller budget" has given you the constraint, and the useful reply is a smaller scope at that price, described precisely enough that the difference is visible. Removing a feature is a real answer; discounting the same scope is a subsidy you pay twice.
If the scope cannot shrink without breaking the point of the project, say so and let the client choose between waiting and going elsewhere. Both beat a project that starts with an argument about value and ends with one about the invoice.
Where this goes wrong
- Dividing by calendar days. It produces a rate that cannot survive a slow month, and the shortfall arrives as debt.
- Quoting days to a client who thinks in projects. It hands them a calculator and an argument you did not choose.
- Absorbing the small addition. Each is invisible; together they are the difference between a profit and a favour.
- Never reviewing it. Costs move every year; a rate set three years ago is a decision someone else made for you.
What this leaves out
It gives no figures, deliberately: a number written here would be wrong in another city next quarter. It does not tell you what the local market pays — you learn that from the quotes you lost. Tax and registration belong to an accountant who knows your file.
We build systems that make this arithmetic visible — projects with a real scope, hours recorded once — because a freelancer who can see where the week went stops guessing at the price.
Services in this article
Articles
Related articles.
A freelancer or an agency: the question behind the price
Skill is not the difference. Continuity is — what happens in the week your one contact is unavailable, and how to ask both candidates about it.
- buying
- hiring
- consulting
Mostaql and Upwork for Algerian freelancers: the honest comparison
The platform is not the decision. Which client you can serve, and how the money reaches your account, decides it — and the answer is usually both.
- freelancing
- algeria
- platforms
Fixed price or time and materials: what you are really choosing
A fixed price buys certainty, and somebody pays for it. What an honest fixed price needs, and when paying by the day is the safer side for the buyer.
- contracts
- buying
- consulting
Start a project
Have something to build?
One short brief is enough. You get a written scope and a fixed quote before anything starts.
