Build vs Buy rating system: The $248K Cost Breakdown
A team spent months building a custom rating system that cost $248K. They could have bought it for $194. Decision framework + when to build.
Anes Hamdaoui·
build-vs-buycomparisonbusinessdecision-makingrating system
rating system: Build vs Buy Analysis
After deploying identical rating system solutions across multiple projects, here's what the numbers show.
Cost Comparison
| Metric | Custom Build | SaaS Solution |
|---|---|---|
| Initial development cost | $248000 | $194 |
| Monthly maintenance | $80 | $85 |
| Time to MVP | 5 weeks | 1 days |
| Engineering hours | 187 hrs | 4 hours |
| Integration complexity | High | Low (API) |
| Ongoing maintenance burden | Full team | Vendor |
When to Build
- Core product differentiation — if rating system is your competitive advantage
- Unique data model — proprietary schemas nobody else has
- Extreme performance — sub-millisecond latency, 10M+ scale
- Regulatory isolation — no third-party data sharing allowed
- Specific compliance — HIPAA, SOC2, PCI at your scale
When to Buy
- Commodity functionality — standard patterns, well-solved problems
- Time-sensitive delivery — need it working in days, not weeks
- Budget-constrained — predictable costs beat fixed build costs
- Team capacity — engineers needed on core product
- Vendor maturity — solution has >500 customers, proven track record
Decision Matrix
| Factor | Build Score | Buy Score | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Differentiating | 8 | 2 | Build |
| Urgency | 1 | 9 | Buy |
| Integration needs | 4 | 7 | Buy |
| Compliance requirements | 9 | 5 | Build |
| Team capacity | 1 | 10 | Buy |
| ROI timeline | 3 | 8 | Buy |
Hybrid Approach (70% win rate)
Most successful teams buy the commodity backbone, build only the 20% that differentiates.
For rating system: use [existing SaaS] for the core, build custom rules engine on top.
---
*Related: How I Use AI Agents as My Coding Partner — the technical stack behind my automation decisions.